Source:David Brady and Mo Fiorina |
Friday, November 30, 2018
Opinions change
9 comments:
Comments are welcome. Keep it short, polite, and on topic.
Thanks to a few abusers I am now moderating comments. I welcome thoughtful disagreement. I will block comments with insulting or abusive language. I'm also blocking totally inane comments. Try to make some sense. I am much more likely to allow critical comments if you have the honesty and courage to use your real name.
Having not heard the talk, what (if anything) did the authors have to say about why? Strategic voting (knowing their answer would be part of a reported statistic)?
ReplyDeleteThis is evidence of bias toward how much control the president exerts over the economy. It is further evidence of home team bias.
ReplyDeleteEd,
Delete"This is evidence of bias toward how much control the president exerts over the economy."
This is evidence of how much control PEOPLE BELIEVE the president has over the economy.
It is also evidence of the crap that passes for economic research these days. Nothing against the 30 companies in the DJIA, but they represent a tiny fraction of total U. S. economic income and output.
A careful examination of the chart shown would indicate that the 3 categories of voter are remarkably correlated (excepting on the occasion of a changeover in administrations).
ReplyDeleteThe "independent" category probably best reflects an unbiased assessment of the degree of "optimism/pessimism". This unaffliated category of voter does appear to indicate that the change in administration was an occasion for improvement in economic outlook irrespective of which of the major parties took power. Is there a message in that, i.e., "plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose."[Jean-Baptiste Alphonse Karr, 1808-90, "Les Guêpes", Jan. 1849]
This is concerning. Republicans aren't a monolithic group (I am one and I can't stand Trump). If the Republicans surveyed went from 15% to 80% basically on the day Trump was elected, they aren't very observant. The economy has been improving since about mid-2009, and it is pretty obvious from stock prices and unemployment numbers. My suspicion is that only highly partisan Republicans and Democrats were surveyed, and that the middle third of the electorate, most of which actually voted for a Republican or a Democrat, was classified as independent for the purpose of this survey.
ReplyDeleteIt is to be expected that partisans will believe that things will get better in the future when their candidate wins. What is remarkable is that for a long period of time only about 25% of Republicans thought things were getting better and they were consistent right through the recession and a large stock market boom with falling unemployment.
ReplyDeleteAre Republicans chronically pessimistic/depressive or did they all hate Obama so much that they would on mass deny the evidence before their eyes?
"Are Republicans chronically pessimistic/depressive or did they all hate Obama so much that they would on mass deny the evidence before their eyes?"
DeleteJudging solely by the Republicans in my extended family circles, the latter. A steady diet of Fox News has really made them completely out of touch with any semblance of reality. Furthermore, when pressed to explain what they would like to see policy wise, they would almost certainly be Democrats.
"Is the economy getting better" is a very vague question, especially if the answer is forward looking.
DeleteIf one believes that the president has the ability to alter regulations and taxes then a step change in expectations is completely rational, especially if the election was surprising.
"Are Republicans chronically pessimistic/depressive or did they all hate Obama so much that they would on mass deny the evidence before their eyes?"
DeleteThere are infinite ways to slice-and-dice the vague phrase "economy getting better." Which is, I suspect, exactly why Brady & Fiorina chose that particular term. Democrats can say "of course the economy was improving 2008-2016, look at unemployment!" while Republicans can say "but labor participation rates are lagging, and what happened to 3% growth?!?!"